|
1980- . :
,
1950- 1960- . ,
. ,
F-104O "" - F-4F ""2, - F-4K/M
"", - F-104S G-91. ,
, ,
F-16.
, , , -
,
, . ,
, , , ,
,
-
.
. ,
-106,
"", .
= 1,8, 10 ,
400 . -106
"", ,
. , -106, 1981 .
,
.
, -106.
TKF, "",
""
. "" ND102,
().
-. 1983 .
, . "",
F-404.
.
: ,
, , ,
, ,
- , .
1981 . (), () ()
,
,
. , 1982 .,
"" - ,
(Agile Combat Aircraft - ). ,
1989 .
"". , ,
= 2, ,
.
,
"" ( ,
- RB199 8800 , 1,2).
1983 .
: 16 , , ,
,
FEFA (Future European Fighter Aircraft -
-). EFA.
- .
DASA (), (), (), - ()
AS ().
-
.
,
,
1.
EFA 1984 .
1986 .
"" , .
.
"" ,
.
,
, 30%
35%.
,
.
EFA
. ,
1960-80- .,
. .
EFA ,
, "".
.
DASS (Defense Aids Sub System),
-
, .
,
, ,
, .
, ,
, , "", F-15, F-16
F/A-18.
EFA -
.
, ,
, .
1985 .
"". -
: - 33%
( 250 ), - 21% (200 )
- 13% (100 ).
. , -
. , - . .
EFA
.
1986 . ,
-, MTU, .
EJ200.
1980- . EFA
: , , .
,
, .
EFA ;
F-16 F/A-18,
.
EFA -
" " (Experimental Aircraft Program),
1983 . . 1986
. EFA, "",
, .
.
.
,
.
: 76%, - 7% - 17%.
1988 .
EFA
, ,
, 53*. ,
, ,
, .
.
,
, .
.
.
,
. ,
-29
, ,
EFA. - ,
. ,
,
F-15, F-16 F/A-18.
EFA. 1992 .
- EFA. "
,
",
- 2000 . - 2002 .
2000 2035 . - EF2000.
, , ,
-, -
-.
,
-. , ,
, " ,
,
".
.
,
12-30%. ,
.
, - .
: ,
,
, . ,
,
.
607 : 250 , 140 , 130
87 .
:
, -
, CASA, .
- 7-10 .
27 1994 . DASA
, ,
N 1 EF2000, DA1.
, DA2, . N 3 7
, N 4 - - -
. .
N 5 ,
ECR 90, a N 6 - . N 3
.
1995 .,
1994 . 1995 .
EJ200 (
- RB199). 4500
, 4000 .
800 , ,
- . ,
, (),
, , .
, 111.
850 . . .
,
. EFA/EF2000 .
, ,
, , "
". ,
, EF2000.
, EF2000 ,
( DASS ),
-29, ,
.
EF2000,
""
36 .
EF2000
30-33 20%. ,
, 30%
.
- ( EF2000
). ,
, , ,
, .
EF2000 2002 .
-29,
- F-4F, "
" AN/APG-65, MIL STD
1553, -124, ,
AIM-120 AMRAAM (
2 . ).
AMRAAM ,
F-4F . " -
"
"". ,
. -29
. ,
:
-
F-4F ,
70 "" ,
;
-
( 36
), EF2000
;
-
EF2000 ( 2006
.), 140 100.
-29
( " "),
EF2000 1,8 .
12 . .
,
.
-29 60 . .
1997 . 12 . 1994 .
100 -29
(80 . ). 20 . .
,
-29,
. -29,
F-1S, F-16, F/A-18 SAAB
JAS-39.
() 5-10
- F-15 F-16. 24
F-15C 265-530 . . (
),
F-16 145-265 . .
F-16C 50 20 .
. .
F-15, F-16 F/A-18. ,
EF2000
-27. ,
, "".
EF2000 ,
( Joust).
,
. -27 -35
( AMRAAM)
. , EF2000
, -27,
XXI ( ,
).
,
, EF2000, ,
"" .
, EF2000
F-22
, F-22 .
, ,
"-94", -35 82%
EF2000 (
, F-22A 91%,
"" - 60%, F-15E - 50%, F/A-18E - 35%, -29 - 32% F-16C - 21%).
, EF2000
-29, ,
-29 EF2000,
.
<1 EF2000 "", -35 F-16C
(, , ),
-29, F/A-18E F-15E.
>1 EF2000,
( ) "", F-16C, -35, -29, F-15E F/A-18E.
, F-16C, "", -35, F-15E, -29 F/A-18E.
, ,
EF2000 ,
(
DASS, ),
-29. , ,
, .
. ,
, . ,
EF2000 ,
, . ,
, EF2000 -29
,
. , EF2000
1,02, -29
- 1,12 - 1,26 (, ,
).
EF2000 300 /, -29 - 310 /,
2,0 2,3,
-29 . -35 (,
, )
- ,
.
, -35
.
,
EF2000 ,
F-22A
, EF2000 .
- ,
, ,
.
, ,
EF2000 ,
. , ,
- ,
,
.
. , EF2000
,
, .
,
EF2000 ,
, ,
, EF2000.
,
. ,
, "
". ,
,
-,
.
.
"-1" -
2003 . 2004 EF-2000 ""
. 148
EF-2000 "" "-1".
EF-2000 . 2015 ""
148, 236 236 . ( 620 EF-2000 "")
- (232 - , 180 - , 121 -
87 - ). 2002
18
"-2" 1,95 (2,55 ). 2007
""
18 15 . "-2"
"-1". 72 ,
EF-2000 "" 707
6 . "-2"
- 14 2004 .
16 2008 . "",
60 "-2".
NETMA
, .
.
"-2" "-1"
, , ,
"-". "-3"
- NETMA. ,
236 "-3" 2008 - 2009 .
"-3" 2013
. , "" "-3" ,
, ,
, .
EF2000.
""
,
. 40% , 20% -
- "" (Al-Li 8090), 18% - , 12% -
10% - . 70%
, 12%, - 15%,
- 3%. ,
9999 .
- , "".
6000 .
, ,
,
.
53 , 2,2.
( )
( ),
. (
, - )
.
.
.
.
.
.
,
, 2,40 2.
, .
, - .
.
,
, , 500 , 700 .
.
EF2000 - RB199-122
(2 7260 ), "".
EJ200 (2
9200 ).
EJ200 -
. ,
, ,
.
.
. 900
.
,
(
), .
, .
:
1000 () 1500 .
.
,
30% , . 1 10
.- ( : F/A-18
27,5 .-). EF2000
45 . 1000
400 ( F/A-18 - 1012 ).
()
, .
,
( ),
.
- ECR90 PIRATE.
ECR90 -,
GEC-, , FIAR
INISEJL ,
.
" ",
" " FRS.2.
, ,
- .
,
.
,
,
.
PIRATE , 1992 .
(Eurofirst) FIAR (), -1
() ().
.
.
,
, ,
, - ,
. , .
9 6
.
EF2000
, -, ,
,
,
.
(Total Terrain Avionics)
.
DASS -
, , -
,
, ,
( , )
.
(
, , ).
13 .
- AIM-120 AMRAAM, "" (
) "" ( ),
, AIM-9
"" ASRAAM .
- 10,
18 140 (40000 ).
. 27- .
6500
, - .
1000 , -
325 - -
1000 . -
3 15 .
.
-
().
. .
,
.
- 16
, .
- 18
. ,
.
,
.
, F-16, F-22 -35, EF2000
,
GEC . -29 EF2000
" ",
( , ,
, , ).
,
.
GEC ,
. -
, ,
, ASRAAM.
.
, ,
. ,
.
.
,
. ,
.
. , ,
.
Www Dog Sex With Girl Com Exclusive
If you want to explore specific dimensions of this topic further,
: Individuals with lower social support or those who are not in romantic relationships often form stronger, "compensatory" attachments to their dogs.
In these storylines, the girl is not "settling" for a dog. She is elevating the relationship. She is saying that loyalty, presence, and warmth are the highest forms of love. When a human man enters that dynamic, he is not entering a love triangle between a woman and a pet. He is entering a sacred space. If he wants her heart, he must first learn to speak the language of the pack—and that language has no words. It only has wagging tails, wet noses, and the silent vow to never leave. www dog sex with girl com exclusive
So many romances (and real-life relationships) are about competition—for time, for attention, for career ambition. The dog boyfriend has no competition. She is his sun, and he orbits accordingly. This total prioritization is a potent fantasy.
While a literal romantic relationship between a girl and a dog is a taboo subject in reality, the storylines that touch on these themes usually aim to explore the . Whether it’s a fairy tale prince in fur or a lonely girl finding her only friend, these stories highlight a desire for a love that is primal, constant, and fiercely protective. If you want to explore specific dimensions of
The relationship between a girl and her often serves as a foundational "love story" in literature and media, representing unconditional support and emotional growth. In contemporary fiction, these bonds frequently catalyze romantic storylines, where a dog acts as a bridge between two human protagonists. The Human-Canine Bond as a "Love Story"
Romantic storylines don’t always need a third person to create tension. Sometimes the most powerful love story is the one where a girl has to choose between human love and the furry soulmate who already owns her heart. She is saying that loyalty, presence, and warmth
Here, the dog acts as a reflection of the heroine’s inner state. Is her apartment a mess, but her Golden Retriever’s bowl is spotless and his walks are regular? She has her priorities straight, even if her love life is chaos. Is the dog anxious, unkempt, or aggressive? It’s a red flag, signaling that the heroine herself is in a state of turmoil or distrust. The way a girl treats her dog is often a visual shorthand for her capacity to love and be vulnerable. A romantic lead who is kind to a scared shelter dog is automatically granted "good guy" status.
For all its appeal, the “dog with girl” trope has a dark side. It walks a fine line between heartwarming devotion and unhealthy codependency. A poorly written “dog” boyfriend can easily become:
In contemporary "dark" fiction or certain niche genres, authors sometimes push the boundaries of this relationship to explore . When a girl feels isolated from society, her dog may become her entire world, leading to a storyline where the emotional intimacy mirrors that of a romantic partner. These narratives often serve as a critique of human loneliness, suggesting that the "purest" love can only be found outside of humanity. The "Star-Crossed" Element
on BookTrib : A review of a memoir about a woman and her Great Dane, Harley, emphasizing that their bond remained unbreakable even through life-altering events like a cancer diagnosis.
. 2008
 |